<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for F1archives.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.f1archives.com/blog/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.f1archives.com/blog</link>
	<description>The Home of Classic F1 Video.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 12:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 1993 British Grand Prix by Jim82 Trl</title>
		<link>http://www.f1archives.com/blog/archives/silverstone93#comment-284</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim82 Trl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 12:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1archives.com/blog/?p=3171#comment-284</guid>
		<description>I could never decide which was more galling Silverstone 93 or Hungary 97.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could never decide which was more galling Silverstone 93 or Hungary 97.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Suzuka 1989: &#8216;The Clash of the Titans&#8217;. by Carnivorouspope</title>
		<link>http://www.f1archives.com/blog/archives/suzuka-89#comment-283</link>
		<dc:creator>Carnivorouspope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 14:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1archives.com/blog/?p=1131#comment-283</guid>
		<description>Although I agree Senna should have been allowed to keep the points and I do prefer him that doesn&#039;t matter, Prost was in front and the corner was his as was said in the rules. I agree he played dirty and deliberately turned in on Ayrton but if that is allowed in the rules unfortunately he did nothing wrong. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I agree Senna should have been allowed to keep the points and I do prefer him that doesn&#8217;t matter, Prost was in front and the corner was his as was said in the rules. I agree he played dirty and deliberately turned in on Ayrton but if that is allowed in the rules unfortunately he did nothing wrong. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2009: Jenson: &#8216;Master of the Universe.&#8217; by Sami Moisio</title>
		<link>http://www.f1archives.com/blog/archives/2009-jenson#comment-282</link>
		<dc:creator>Sami Moisio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 23:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1archives.com/blog/?p=815#comment-282</guid>
		<description>Rubens should have taken that one.. :/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rubens should have taken that one.. :/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by Randomsoul</title>
		<link>http://www.f1archives.com/blog/archives/about#comment-281</link>
		<dc:creator>Randomsoul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 01:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1archives.com/blog/?p=2456#comment-281</guid>
		<description>Thank you so much for your efforts. I just found this site and I&#039;m stoked! Been dreaming about all those amazing races from the 80&#039;s and 90&#039;s for years, wishing I could go back on any given Sunday and watch &#039;em again. Thanks to your efforts I can!!!  This means a lot to me and will really help the off seasons in the future.
PS The technical episodes are awesome as well. So much F1 information!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much for your efforts. I just found this site and I&#8217;m stoked! Been dreaming about all those amazing races from the 80&#8242;s and 90&#8242;s for years, wishing I could go back on any given Sunday and watch &#8216;em again. Thanks to your efforts I can!!!  This means a lot to me and will really help the off seasons in the future.<br />
PS The technical episodes are awesome as well. So much F1 information!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 1994 Japanese Grand Prix by Randomsoul</title>
		<link>http://www.f1archives.com/blog/archives/suzuka94#comment-280</link>
		<dc:creator>Randomsoul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 23:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1archives.com/blog/?p=2440#comment-280</guid>
		<description>Confusing commentary! Schumaucher is 4 secs. behind Hill (1 sec. later) Schumaucher leads! No explanation, no replay of the pass. And how does someone win a race in second place. &quot;On aggregate...&quot; WTF This is a math formula! I&#039;m watching a race not in math class. What is the relevant data for this formula so I can at least know what they are referring to when they say &quot;On aggregate...&quot;. It seems this is the most relevant information in determining the race winner. NOT who comes in 1st, 2nd or 3rd. &quot;Damon Hill finishes first by x.xx secs. but is it enough?&quot; WTF he finished 1st!!!!!!???? The commentators should have really what that means. Because from what I saw Damon Hill comfortably lead and won the Japanese GP. Not that thrilling. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Confusing commentary! Schumaucher is 4 secs. behind Hill (1 sec. later) Schumaucher leads! No explanation, no replay of the pass. And how does someone win a race in second place. &#8220;On aggregate&#8230;&#8221; WTF This is a math formula! I&#8217;m watching a race not in math class. What is the relevant data for this formula so I can at least know what they are referring to when they say &#8220;On aggregate&#8230;&#8221;. It seems this is the most relevant information in determining the race winner. NOT who comes in 1st, 2nd or 3rd. &#8220;Damon Hill finishes first by x.xx secs. but is it enough?&#8221; WTF he finished 1st!!!!!!???? The commentators should have really what that means. Because from what I saw Damon Hill comfortably lead and won the Japanese GP. Not that thrilling. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 1979 German Grand Prix by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.f1archives.com/blog/archives/hockenheim79#comment-279</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1archives.com/blog/?p=3163#comment-279</guid>
		<description>Fantastic track..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic track..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nige! WTF Happened There? by Info</title>
		<link>http://www.f1archives.com/blog/archives/nige-wtf#comment-278</link>
		<dc:creator>Info</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 17:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1archives.com/blog/?p=2410#comment-278</guid>
		<description>that guy took his cap</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that guy took his cap</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 1986 Brazilian Grand Prix by SimS</title>
		<link>http://www.f1archives.com/blog/archives/rio-1986#comment-277</link>
		<dc:creator>SimS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 23:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1archives.com/blog/?p=3151#comment-277</guid>
		<description>Amazing race. Piquet once said that this was his easiest win. Stealing Clive James words, Piquet got a car that went like him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing race. Piquet once said that this was his easiest win. Stealing Clive James words, Piquet got a car that went like him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on F1archives&#8217; Top Ten Best Looking Cars. by Gregz0r</title>
		<link>http://www.f1archives.com/blog/archives/top10#comment-276</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregz0r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1archives.com/blog/?p=188#comment-276</guid>
		<description>The 1983 car? Decent, but not much of a looker, in my opinion. The short side pods ruin the aesthetic.
But hey, it&#039;s like women, one man&#039;s princess, is another man&#039;s crackhead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 1983 car? Decent, but not much of a looker, in my opinion. The short side pods ruin the aesthetic.<br />
But hey, it&#8217;s like women, one man&#8217;s princess, is another man&#8217;s crackhead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on F1archives&#8217; Top Ten Best Looking Cars. by Drivemsm</title>
		<link>http://www.f1archives.com/blog/archives/top10#comment-275</link>
		<dc:creator>Drivemsm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1archives.com/blog/?p=188#comment-275</guid>
		<description>Cannot take this seriously when the Brabham BMW BT52/B doesn&#039;t even make it into your top ten. I can only assume that you&#039;re too young to recall it or that you have no aesthetic taste whatsoever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cannot take this seriously when the Brabham BMW BT52/B doesn&#8217;t even make it into your top ten. I can only assume that you&#8217;re too young to recall it or that you have no aesthetic taste whatsoever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

